Filosofija. Sociologija https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija <p>Filosofija. Sociologija publishes original research articles in the fields of philosophy and sociology. Philosophical and sociological articles are published as separate issues of the journal. The philosophical issues cover, but are not restricted to, the following topics: history of philosophy, epistemology, phenomenology, cultural studies, etc. The sociological issues cover different topics of sociology and demography preferably based on comparative empirical data. The interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research is especially encouraged. Contributions are accepted in English and Lithuanian. The journal is covered by Clarivate Web of Science since 2008. 2025 impact factor 0.3, 5-year impact factor 0.3.</p> Lietuvos mokslų akademijos leidybos skyrius en-US Filosofija. Sociologija 0235-7186 Title https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/7192 <p>&nbsp; &nbsp;</p> Lietuvos mokslų akademija Copyright (c) 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 Contents https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/7193 <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> Lietuvos mokslų akademija Copyright (c) 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 The Odyssey of Post-modernity: Caught Between Experience and Technology https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/7194 <p>Philosophy is a&nbsp;discipline inherently linked to human condition and human activity. It researches both how humanity experiences the&nbsp;world, and how humanity changes and affects the&nbsp;world. Nevertheless, the&nbsp;question of news technologies made the&nbsp;whole situation even muddier, because at least since the&nbsp;dawn of modernity, humanity and the&nbsp;ways humanity experiences the&nbsp;world have been just as strongly changed by technology (or maybe even in a&nbsp;stronger, more radical way) as the&nbsp;world was. This article analyses the&nbsp;relationship between the&nbsp;ways experience changes humanity, and how, in turn, technology changes both experience and humanity as well. The&nbsp;paper is divided into two parts: one analysing the&nbsp;experience and its effects, and the&nbsp;other analysing technology and its consequences.</p> Alfredas Buiko Copyright (c) 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 239 241 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.0 The Importance of the Conception of Life for the Philosophy of Sustainable Development: Bergson’s Contribution https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/6641 <p>Bergson’s conception of life can provide the&nbsp;basis for the&nbsp;philosophy of the&nbsp;doctrine of sustainable development. The&nbsp;paper distinguishes not only three essential components of the&nbsp;doctrine (ecology, economy, social policy), not only two contexts necessary for its implementation (technologies, culture or a&nbsp;change in the&nbsp;way of thinking), but also the&nbsp;specifics of the&nbsp;inter-relationship among all these structural parts of the&nbsp;doctrine. By analysing two modalities of the&nbsp;experience of life, articulated in Bergson’s philosophy, it is shown how the&nbsp;implementation of the&nbsp;doctrine of sustainable development is structurally dependent on them. Each of the&nbsp;components of the&nbsp;doctrine is analysed in interaction with the&nbsp;élan vital and its fundamental expression in human consciousness which Bergson calls ‘creative emotion’.</p> Povilas Aleksandravicius Mangoua Roland Tehia Copyright (c) 2026 Povilas Aleksandravicius 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 242 249 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.1 The Phenomenology of Sustainability: From Ontic Indicators to the Search for Ontological Meaning https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/6527 <p>This study examines how sustainability should be understood not merely as a&nbsp;set of measurements and targets, but as a&nbsp;more profound philosophical concept. By temporarily suspending the&nbsp;instrumental and technical approaches dominant in current sustainability discourse, the&nbsp;study aims to uncover the&nbsp;fundamental conditions upon which the&nbsp;concept’s meaning rests. A&nbsp;phenomenological method was adopted in the&nbsp;study, examining how sustainability is experienced as a&nbsp;matter of ‘meaning’ and ‘value’ and how it is linked to a&nbsp;sense of responsibility. The&nbsp;study’s central argument is that measurable indicators (ontic level) gain legitimacy only when they are compatible with this deeper existential ground (ontological level) that gives them meaning. Through temporal consciousness and narratives, it is demonstrated how the&nbsp;act of ‘sustaining’ creates a&nbsp;continuity between the&nbsp;past, present and future.</p> Hasan TUTAR Copyright (c) 2026 Hasan TUTAR 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 250 257 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.2 Heideggerian Notes on Science Education https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/6953 <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: small;">The article discusses issues, trends and possibilities in current education in Heideggerian terms. It follows a&nbsp;previous article that introduced the&nbsp;relevancy of Heideggerian philosophy for the&nbsp;topic of education. The&nbsp;approach of formal indication and the&nbsp;issues of deworlding and Being-in-the-world were explored. The&nbsp;reader may have been left with the&nbsp;question whether this approach to teaching and learning is only relevant to humanities and akin fields or to sciences as well. Hence the&nbsp;exploration in this second part continues with respect to the&nbsp;relevancy of an ‘other’ relation to language (logos) because currently education, like current sciences, supervenes on a&nbsp;Being-forgetful notion of ratio, whereas ‘reworlding’ and ‘reontologizing’ have to do with other possibilities.er possibilities .</span></span></p> Nerijus Copyright (c) 2026 Nerijus 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 258 264 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.3 Cultural Hybridisation and the Perspective of Transcultural Philosophy in Jean-Yves Heurtebise’s Theory https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/6860 <p>This article aims to define the&nbsp;main features of questioning the&nbsp;differences between Western and Eastern civilisations in 21st-century transculturalism, highlighting the&nbsp;main signs of change in relation to traditional comparativism. The&nbsp;main focus is on the&nbsp;intersections between the&nbsp;thinking traditions of Chinese and Western civilisations. By reviewing Jean-Yves Heurebise’s analysis of this issue and his insights, the&nbsp;article seeks to identify the&nbsp;essential signs of change and differences in comparative studies (comparative studies) in relation to transculturalism. The&nbsp;article provides a&nbsp;concise overview of different concepts of culture and civilisation in the&nbsp;humanities and attempts to define and understand the&nbsp;images of Chinese and Western civilisations from the&nbsp;perspective of this theorist.</p> Tautvydas Copyright (c) 2026 Tautvydas Vėželis 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 265 275 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.4 Alternative Archival Ecologies of Memory: Mnemonic Significance of Body and Media https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/7195 <p>This article explores how memory is shaped by media ecologies, emphasising embodied and postcolonial perspectives. Challenging digital and Eurocentric archival practices and its infrastructures, we examine the&nbsp;disembodiment of memory in digital environments and advocate for alternative, embodied forms of remembrance. Drawing on thinkers such as Stiegler, Simondon, Derrida and Foucault, the&nbsp;text underscores the&nbsp;ontological and political stakes of archiving. Through case studies from Latin America and philosophical inquiry, the&nbsp;article proposes a&nbsp;revaluation of bodily practices, local traditions, and intersubjective rituals as vital infrastructures for cultural memory, justice, and epistemic diversity in a&nbsp;digitised and globalised world.</p> Mindaugas Briedis Mariano Navarro Copyright (c) 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 273 281 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.5 The Soviet Look (Le regarde) in Lithuania https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/6844 <p>This paper consolidates an existentialist understanding of the&nbsp;Soviet Look. A&nbsp;significant aspect of Jean-Paul Sartre’s existentialist philosophy, gaze theory or the&nbsp;look (Le regarde), is redeployed within the&nbsp;context of Soviet Lithuania, a&nbsp;pertinent choice as Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir visited Lithuania in 1965. The&nbsp;primary aim thereof is to reconstruct the&nbsp;Soviet look from a&nbsp;Sartrean perspective. A&nbsp;primary problematic is integral to the&nbsp;Soviet look; a&nbsp;look whose raison d’être is to fix the&nbsp;Soviet Lithuanian as an objective world, a&nbsp;being-in-itself [1’etre-en-soi], in the&nbsp;face a&nbsp;contradictory need, as the&nbsp;Lithuanian self, to have an authentic lived experience, a&nbsp;Lithuanian being-for-itself [l’etie-poui-soi]. The&nbsp;process of objectification, of the&nbsp;Lithuanian subject, occurs without an immediate gaze which means that the&nbsp;kernel of the&nbsp;Soviet look is that it turns the&nbsp;subject into an object not so much as in absentia, but rather in an atmospheric, attunement manner. While the&nbsp;attributes of the&nbsp;Soviet look are referenced, including its controlling, pan­optic presence, a&nbsp;crucial existentialist contribution is that the&nbsp;Soviet gaze is in bad faith.</p> Leonard Stone Copyright (c) 2026 Leonard Stone 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 282 291 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.6 Reflection on Visual Art in the Philosophy of Experience https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/6956 <p>Šiame straipsnyje nagrinėjama meno refleksija fenomenologijos ir hermeneutikos kontekste. Remiantis Edmundo Husserlio ir Algio Mickūno idėjomis, aptariama fenomenologinės redukcijos reikšmė meno patyrimui, taip pat nagrinėjamos Maurice’o Merleau-Ponty idėjos apie intersubjektyvumą ir kūniškumą. Siekiama supažindinti skaitytoją su hermeneutine meno refleksijos samprata ir palyginti Hanso-Georgo Gadamerio horizontų susiliejimo ir fenomenologinės redukcijos būsenas patiriant kūrybą. Straipsnyje aptariama, kaip asmuo reflektuoja estetinę patirtį, išryškinant subjekto svarbą meno suvokimo procese ir atskleidžiant sąmonės ir kūrinio prasminį ryšį. Keliamas klausimas, ar menas gali būti suvokiamas spontaniškai ir ar įmanoma jo refleksija atsiribojus nuo išankstinio žinojimo ir pasitelkiant vien dabarties patyrimo akimirką. Keliama hipotezė, kad meno kūrinys tampa būties įvykiu tada, kai ikirefleksinis patyrimas įgalina dailininko perspektyvą virsti tiesiogine egzistencine patirtimi.</p> Ieva Dubnova Copyright (c) 2026 Ieva Dubnova 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 292 303 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.7 The Rupture of Being: From the Ontological Abyss of War to the Transfigured Self https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/6863 <p>This article analyses the&nbsp;‘rupture of being’ as a&nbsp;limiting existential experience caused by war. It examines the&nbsp;ontic state in which a&nbsp;traumatic past permeates the&nbsp;future, forming a&nbsp;‘trace of inevitability’ and leading to a&nbsp;radical collapse of the&nbsp;predictable world. Based on a&nbsp;synthesis of S.&nbsp;Zweig’s existential-biographical method, Z.&nbsp;Bauman’s theory of liquid modernity, R.&nbsp;Kearney’s narrative hermeneutics, and J.-L.&nbsp;Marion’s phenomenology, this study examines metaphysical entropy through the&nbsp;prism of ‘saturated phenomena’. The&nbsp;author’s concepts of ‘bleeding nationhood’ and the&nbsp;‘Icon of Nationhood’ are utilised as analytical tools. The&nbsp;study conceptualises the&nbsp;‘wounded human’s’ path of initiation: a&nbsp;transition from the&nbsp;paralysing Idol of war to the&nbsp;Living Countenance. This encounter determines the&nbsp;transformation of the&nbsp;personal core. Through this rebirth, the&nbsp;phenomenon of the&nbsp;Living Icon is revealed, ensuring salvation directly from the&nbsp;epicenter of chaos. Overcoming the&nbsp;rupture of being and emerging from the&nbsp;ontological abyss is achieved through spiritual initiation. This process replaces rigid constructions with a&nbsp;new architecture of consciousness and a&nbsp;dynamic renewal of the&nbsp;spirit, creating a&nbsp;sustainable bridge to the&nbsp;recovered Logos.</p> Olena Romanova Copyright (c) 2026 Olena Romanova 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 304 313 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.8 Neo-Nomads in the Digital Space: Mobile Identity in the Age of Informational Rhizome https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/7196 <p>Contemporary reality, marked by dynamism, rhizomatic structures, and digital technologies, gives rise to a&nbsp;new model of human existence&nbsp;–&nbsp;digital nomadism. Combining poststructuralist analysis, a&nbsp;philosophical-cultural approach, and a&nbsp;hermeneutic interpretation of digital culture, the&nbsp;authors argue that the&nbsp;digital nomad is not merely a&nbsp;new lifestyle, but a&nbsp;profound anthropological and cultural shift that transforms conceptions of identity, community and reality itself. The&nbsp;conclusions emphasise the&nbsp;processual, fragmented and technologically dependent nature of digital identity, which manifests within an antinomic, mosaic and ‘elusive’ cultural space.</p> Inna Kovalenko Yuliia Meliakova Olesia Andrushchenko Copyright (c) 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 314 322 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.9 Technoscience and the Shift of Civic Ideals: Ethical and Cultural Dimension https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/6845 <p>The impact of modern technological advances on the&nbsp;changing cultural, ethical and social ideals has been of interest in recent decades. The&nbsp;proponents of technological determinism are convinced that the&nbsp;essential basis of culture is technology as it shapes its semantic context and determines civic ideals. However, the&nbsp;developers of cultural constructivism state that technologies themselves are shaped by cultural values and practices, thus acting as an integral part of their functioning. The&nbsp;article demonstrates the&nbsp;one-sidedness of these approaches, showing that the&nbsp;relationship between technology, culture, and social ideals is neither linear nor uniquely determined. It rather involves the&nbsp;processes of adaptation, transformation, and mutual formation. With this in view, the&nbsp;method of analysis and the&nbsp;comparative method were used in the&nbsp;article. The&nbsp;conclusion about the&nbsp;ambiguity of this mutual influence and mutual creation has been made. The&nbsp;latest technologies, on the&nbsp;one hand, create favourable conditions for the&nbsp;revival of culture and ethics. On the&nbsp;other, they pose a&nbsp;serious challenge to the&nbsp;very foundations of our humanity. It has been stated that for the&nbsp;‘survival’ of a&nbsp;human and the&nbsp;culture in the&nbsp;conditions of a&nbsp;new technological reality, a&nbsp;new rationality is required, that is, a&nbsp;clear understanding of who we are, where we are going and why. This, in its turn, necessitates the&nbsp;ethics, aimed at developing clear moral norms regarding the&nbsp;creation of new technological and scientific opportunities and their controlled use to minimise negative impacts on humans, their values and ideals.</p> Oksana Chursinova MARIA SINELNIKOVA Copyright (c) 2026 Oksana Chursinova, MARIA SINELNIKOVA 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 323 330 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.10 Unfinished Rituals: The Double-edged Sword of Digital Afterlives https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/7066 <p>This study aims to reveal the&nbsp;impact of AI resurrection on the&nbsp;mental health of bereaved relatives. The&nbsp;study primarily employs qualitative research and case analysis methodologies.<br>AI resurrection has a&nbsp;significant dual impact on the&nbsp;mental health of bereaved relatives. On the&nbsp;positive side, AI resurrection can provide an immediate emotional comfort (such as alleviating acute grief and making up for the&nbsp;regret of unspoken goodbyes), assist in psychological healing (as a&nbsp;buffer for trauma and reducing feelings of loneliness), and contribute to cultural continuity (preserving voices, memories, and fulfilling wishes). Cases have shown that it can lower anxiety and depression scores, helping users gradually adapt to reality. However, the&nbsp;misuse of AI resurrection technology can easily hinder the&nbsp;normal grieving process, causing users to become immersed in the&nbsp;illusion that the&nbsp;deceased is still present, delaying acceptance of reality; it may also trigger cognitive dissonance (emotional dependence despite knowing it is virtual), psychological dependency (such as a&nbsp;digital painkiller), distortion of memory and emotions, and social withdrawal. Long-term reliance may lead to complicated grief or depression.<br>Therefore, ethical guidelines and legal supervision are needed to balance the&nbsp;application of AI resurrection technology, preventing it from being perverted into a&nbsp;digital prison.</p> Sherman XIE Copyright (c) 2026 Sherman XIE 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 331 342 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.11 Can Artificial Intelligence be Socratic? https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/6683 <p>This essay introduces the&nbsp;concept of Socratic Intelligence (SI) and proposes five premises: (1)&nbsp;artificial and human agents learn through observation, interaction, and reflective examination of those interactions; (2)&nbsp;what is learned depends on metacognition and reinforcement; (3)&nbsp;SI comprises five interlocking dimensions: epistemic curiosity, critical self-awareness, assumption analysis, dialogical competence, and intellectual humility; (4)&nbsp;Generative SI, embedded in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) or Large Language Models (LLMs), can scaffold human learning; and (5)&nbsp;Generative SI can apply the&nbsp;Socratic method recursively to a&nbsp;system’s own computational processes as a&nbsp;form of internal epistemic self-regulation. We situate SI within several philosophical traditions: Plato’s elenchus and docta ignorantia, Aristotle’s phronesis, virtue epistemology on intellectual humility, Dreyfus’s critique of cognitivism, and recent epistemology of LLMs. We argue that SI construct gives the&nbsp;philosophy of AI a&nbsp;normative vocabulary that interfaces classical philosophy with current machine-learning practice.</p> Aiste Dirzyte Aleksandras Patapas Copyright (c) 2026 Aiste Dirzyte, Aleksandras Patapas 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 343 351 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.12 AI, Probability, and Kurt Gödel https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/7197 <p>Probability is central to the&nbsp;functioning of AI. But LLMs tend to regularly hallucinate, or respond to interaction or other inquiries in improbable ways. Nonetheless, through proper training AI can be transformed into an increasingly closed system of options, thereby creating more certainty and improving the&nbsp;decisions made by this technology. Scaling is the&nbsp;process touted regularly to achieve this aim. Nonetheless, the&nbsp;creation of closed systems is in question following the&nbsp;work on logic by Kurt Gödel. Subsequent to Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, the&nbsp;creation of any closed is in jeopardy. The&nbsp;impact of this discovery for understanding probability is important, including the&nbsp;functioning of AI. The&nbsp;implications of Godel’s work on logic and AI, particularly the&nbsp;ability of AI to more closely mimic human decision-making is examined to make AI more socially relevant.</p> John W. Murphy Carlos Largacha-Martínez Copyright (c) 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 352 360 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.13 Artificial Intelligence from the Perspectives of Philosophy, Sociology and Communication https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/7198 <p>The article discusses the&nbsp;main ideas presented at a&nbsp;scientific conference on artificial intelligence viewed from the&nbsp;perspectives of philosophy, sociology and communication. AI cannot be regarded merely as a&nbsp;narrow technical or computer science topic, since its development raises fundamental questions about the&nbsp;nature of the&nbsp;human mind, the&nbsp;cognitive capacities and creativity of the&nbsp;human being, and the&nbsp;development of society. The&nbsp;papers presented at the&nbsp;conference reveal not only the&nbsp;new opportunities that AI opens up for humanity, but also the&nbsp;risks it poses in education, media, politics, warfare, artistic creativity, social inequality, human self-understanding, and other domains. The&nbsp;article shows that AI’s ability to perform various tasks quickly and efficiently does not mean that it can take over what is most essential to human beings&nbsp;–&nbsp;understanding, interpretation, value orientations, the&nbsp;creation of meaning, and a&nbsp;responsible relationship with other people and with the&nbsp;natural and social environment. Therefore, the&nbsp;development of AI compels us to consider not only what technologies can do better or faster than human beings, but also what still remains beyond the&nbsp;reach of algorithms&nbsp;–&nbsp;lived experience, embodiment, creative intention, moral responsibility, and the&nbsp;capacity to reflect on the&nbsp;meaning of one’s actions. The&nbsp;article argues that AI should be understood not only as a&nbsp;technological system, but also as a&nbsp;social, cultural and political force reshaping human values and everyday life. It concludes that AI must be assessed in an interdisciplinary way, taking into account not only criteria of innovation or performance, but also its consequences for human beings, democracy, and meaningful human existence.</p> Edvardas Rimkus Copyright (c) 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 361 370 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.14 Freedom of Speech: What Rights and what Responsibilities? https://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/7199 <p>The review analyses a&nbsp;monograph published by Peter Lang Publishing in 2024 and authored by Tomas Kačerauskas and Algis Mickunas, the&nbsp;book focuses on the&nbsp;lived experience and structures of awareness that make communication possible. Their approach centres on the&nbsp;difference between freedom of speech and free speech. Freedom of speech is a&nbsp;right, as legally granted by a&nbsp;government. Free speech, in one sense, sits at the&nbsp;basis of civilisation.</p> Joe Pilotta Copyright (c) 2026-09-23 2026-09-23 37 3 371 374 10.6001/fil-soc.2026.37.3.15